President Obama last week announced an initiative to double the average fuel efficiency of vehicles to 55 miles per gallon by 2025.
He made this pledge during remarks in Washington, D.C., flanked by "leaders of the world's largest auto companies," as he said during his speech. I found it curious that there were no lenders on the dais with Obama and the manufacturers. As we can all attest, the overwhelming majority of cars purchased today are financed. Without banks, the automotive industry would be a fly on the back of the economy, instead of its backbone. The automotive industry accounted for 10% of this nation's GDP as recently as 2008, according to Ford Motor Co. Chief Executive Alan Mullaly.
I think the government needs to get involved not just in establishing standards for the manufacturing of automobiles, but also in helping further the purchases of high-efficiency vehicles. And I have a few ideas as to how that involvement can take shape.
The federal government has already once involved itself in trying to help persuade consumers to exchange older, less efficient vehicles for cars and trucks that get better gas mileage. "Cash for Clunkers" was a boon for the auto industry. But it didn't last long enough or go far enough. If the federal government really wants to be an agent for change, it has to hit consumers where it matters most: in their wallets.
President Obama can talk about the money that consumers can save by buying less gas, but that money comes in small amounts over years and years of driving. He needs to show consumers he means business by giving them more of a financial incentive to change their behavior. If he wants people to follow his lead, he needs to put his money where his mouth is.
Comment by Ralph Jones on August 4, 2011 at 11:13am
Comment by Frank Rauscher on August 4, 2011 at 11:27am Good post!
Part of that tax would have to be diverted to Highway Trust funds for road repairs. and it will need to be coordinated with individual state taxes on fuel. Higher MPG does not reduce wear and tear on the roads.
Comment by Craig on August 4, 2011 at 12:00pm These are the type of entitlements and government intervention in market activities that were central to the debt ceiling negotiations and that we as citizens need to stop always looking for, especially if we are upset with the size of the federal budget deficit, as these programs cost money.
The tax deduction of mortgage interest has been a fiscal policy used to encourage home ownership, which typically an appreciating asset. Adding the additional expense for tax deductions on auto loan interest only serves to subsidize vehicle prices, passing tax dollars into the coffers of auto manufacturers and lenders (or the ABS investors). Additionally, the mortgage interest deduction may being going away in the future, so this is going to be tougher to pass through.
Comment
Subscribe to Auto Finance News by clicking here.
About Us
Guide to Posting Images
Videos
Code of Ethics
Advertise
Our Other Sites:
ACMG
Cargo Facts
Bank Innovation
________________________
Subscribe to our sister publication, Auto Finance News. Click here to learn more about the industry's leading newsmagazine or here for VIP access.
You agree that in posting to this site you will abide by the Terms of Service spelled out below.
© 2013 Created by JJ Hornblass.

You need to be a member of AutoFinanceNews.net to add comments!
Join AutoFinanceNews.net